So, it’s not a case of strange by name and strange by nature, as there is way too much that is familiar in the plot-shaping and characterisation of this movie. Nothing happens that is genuinely surprising/unexpected. That said, the film works hard to make magic in the real world credible (although it doesn’t entirely succeed) and Benedict Cumerbatch and Tilda Swinton work hard to make the whole piece engaging. All things considered, the film just about gets away with it. There are some funny lines and moments (helped by a stony-faced librarian called Wong) and some of the spells are intriguing in their potential. However, there is too much clumsy exposition about the multiverse and its enegies (they really should have thought about how the original Star Wars explains things – less is more!), the Satanic baddie is pure derivative tosh and there is no genuine sense of jeopardy. A lot of mumbo jumbo, smoke and mirrors. When all is said and done, I enjoyed it and would watch the inevitable follow-up, but I can’t score it more than 7.5 out of 10.
Well, just finished one story for The Book of Dragons (follow-up to The Book of Angels, init). Now starting another called ‘The Lecturer’ – strangely autobiographical.
Meanwhile, I’m being hampered by my addiction to the game http://www.slither.io. Don’t check it out, is my advice. It’ll ruin you.
Also still being plagued by a cold of five weeks. I’ve tried vitamin C, garlic, Boots, the sacrifice of children to obscure deities, and so on. Can’t quite shake it. Keep thinking it’s gone, but then it catches me all unawares again. Sheesh.
Waiting on Huddersfield Uni. to confirm a date for my PhD viva – it’ll be nice to get it over with. The administration seem to be moving with glacial speed, however. Ironically, already have a publishing contract for the PhD write-up, which is on the history and sub-genres of British fantasy.
Been watching Daredevil series 1 of late. It’s extremely violent – much more so than Luke Cage or Jessica Jones. And there’s a lot of muttered dialogue, which is annoying. Some episodes feel very contemporary and some feel very dated/cliched. But overall there’s something compelling about it. King Pin is extremely well played. Nuff said.
Happy Halloween to you all (and go and buy a copy of The Book of Angels, for crying out loud).
I watched Now You See Me last night. The story’s about four stage magicians apparently robbing a bank while still on stage. Inevitably, the FBI get after them and there’s lots of chasing around, from pop-up magic event to pop-up event. It’s an entertaining movie if you’re into the problem-solving ‘how did they pull that off?’ aspect of proceedings. If you’re looking for rounded characters and issues of moral conflict, you’ll be a bit disappointed and probably missing the point. The themes of the movie are those of magic itself – 1. spectacle used to misdirect the audience 2. theatrical persona and 3. whether magic really exists or whether it’s just a con.
There’s a star cast involved, including Mark Ruffalo, Isla Fisher, Morgan Freeman, Michael Caine, Woody Harrelson and so on, so many in fact that a good number of them are wasted/redundant. Some people will enjoy the special FX, but others will be irritated by the CGI (cheating really) and the implausability of the explanations around some of the tricks. That being said, there is a genuine/logical twist at the end about who the ‘mastermind’ behind it all actually is. Now You See Me is one of those films that you’ll be glad you’ve seen, because it does offer a fresh take on the usual crime-caper/heist genre. So, it’s a 7.5 out of 10 from me! (Paul Daniels will be spinning in his grave though.)
So, the much anticipated companion series to Marvel’s Jessica Jones went on UK release on 30 Sept 2016. How does Luke Cage stack up? Well, Luke is of course a very stacked hero, and there’s plenty of opportunity for him to flex those pecs when taking on the gangs of Harlem. Yes, it’s a much more wham-bam series than Jessica Jones, and so pounding most of the time that it inevitably lacks the smooth noir mood of JJ. LC also sacrifices subtlety and nuance for tempo and compulsive viewing. This lack isn’t just in plotting but also in characterisation – and certainly in the first three episodes (as reported by a good number of viewers) it’s hard to give two hoots about LC himself, although things greatly improve from episode 4 onwards.
Clearly, then, LC is far from perfect (and nowhere near as good as JJ for my money), but it’s well worth a watch. The political situation within Harlem is intriguing and twisted, although the larger politics of the series as a piece of art are a tad dodgy (with a Shaft-blacksploitation feel and a very hetero-normative depiction of women). The ‘moral compass’ of the piece shifts around a fair bit, regularly catching the viewer out. And there are enough tricks and quotable lines that you can’t end up loving it (guiltily maybe, but it’s still love). 8 out of 10 from me. Give it a go!
‘I was bitten by a radioactive printing press.’
‘I’d murder my own grandmother to write a Doctor Who novel.’
Here is a summary of the open and inspiring conversation that took place between Marcus Gipps (editor at Gollancz) and guest-of-honour Scott Lynch on 24 Sept 2016. The summary was put together by A J Dalton (Gollancz author), audience member.
Marcus Gipps [MG]: So, Scott, when did you start writing? And why fantasy?
Scott Lynch [SL]: It was basically laziness. I wasn’t much of a fantasy reader early on in my life – I was reading scifi instead. From the local library I was borrowing True Story Adventure Books (the US version of Fighting Fantasy style choice-stories), John Christopher’s Tripods sequence, and The Prince in Waiting, and Doctor Who novels. I was reading Doctor Who from like 8 or 9 years old, and hadn’t even seen the TV show. My idea of Doctor Who from the books bore very little relation to the TV show, actually! I read ‘Remembrance of the Daleks’ and William Gibson’s Neuromancer, and they had huge influences on me. I read Frank Herbert’s Dune like ten times. I was disappointed to learn Herbert died when I was just 8.
Then this guy in a corridor at school comes up to me, puts a copy of Raymond E Feist’s The Magician in my hand, says ‘Dude, read this!’ and walks away. I was in the book shop buying the whole sequence just four days later! That’s how and when I started reading fantasy.
I wanted to be a musician, and was only held back by the issue of not having any musical talent whatsoever. Then I wanted to be a comicbook artist, and had some ability, but realised I was just dicking around while others were really dedicated and hard working. So, because of that laziness I mentioned before, writing somehow ended up being the easiest path for me. By my late teens, I was realising that writing was it.
In my twenties, I was living a ramshackle life. To get money, I started self-publishing D&D materials, because Wizards of the Coast were kind of open source with it. I learnt a lot of craft there, concerning magical systems and organising a world. Once I started writing books though, I realised that was my preference and where my energy should be – gaming can be frustrating when the other players just don’t do what you want them to do!
MG: How did you get published?
SL: I was bitten by a radioactive printing press. No, I was lucky enough to be a member of an online forum that had real writers on it (like Neal Asher and R Scott Bakker, etc). Us aspiring writers all liked to moan and say exactly how things should be in fantasy writing. One of the writers then challenged us to write something or just shut up. I was kind of forced to write a prologue and a scene from The Lies of Locke Lamora. I put up a blog called ‘Newbie writes a book’, which was all of four posts. The writer who’d challenged me said, ‘Good work. Write the rest.’ And one person on the forum was an acquisitions editor, which never happens of course. It was Simon Spanton of Gollancz. He emailed me! He asked for more. I said, ‘Give me 48hrs!’ I wrote the whole first chapter of Lies and sent it to him. He said, ‘It’s brill. Where’s the rest?’ I didn’t have the rest, of course. Eventually, Gollancz said, ‘We have faith. We’re buying it.’ By late 2005, Lies was done and I haven’t had to do respectable work since then.
MG: The well documented break between books two and three, a period you’ve been very open about, seemed to help with the success of Lies?
SL: Yeah. The break allowed word-of-mouth to spread. It’s the long-tail and networking effect. It’s nothing I consciously did. It was huge luck and the human decency of people who bought the books.
MG: And you were being very open about your clinical depression.
SL: It was kind of forced on me. A guy interviewing me said, ‘We’ve not heard from you for two or three years. Where have you been?’ It struck me nakedly – I thought, ‘Either I’m open or I dodge this question for the next three years.’ Being open was an act of self-defence. It was useful. It was therapeutic. I was going through a divorce. It takes anyone months to realise they’re not a failure. Clinical depression is often driven by a cultural requirement for self-sufficiency. The attitude is unhealthy. My grandma lived six decades in a marriage like that. She even reached the point where she slipped and broke her arm but didn’t want to ‘bother’ the doctor. It sounds ridiculous, but that is what happens and where it can get you.
Once you open up, you realise it’s not just you. The failure is not just you. Depression, when you are isolated, is a self-feeding and self-defending illness. When you share about it, you find similar symptoms in other people and it ends the silence and self-feeding isolation.
MG: Queen of the Iron Sands? What is it? Why?
SL: It’s an online serial novel I started in 2009. Back then, it was a different digital landscape. There was no crowd-funding, just the ‘donation model’. I would put up a piece in the series and ask for donations in order for me to complete the next piece. The model doesn’t really work – you get one-off big donations, a few small ones, and then a lot of no-donations. We had fun with the series though. I wanted to write a Flash Gordon serial where Ming was not useless and incompetent. It was also self-therapy – but the seven episodes show how successful it wasn’t in the longer-term. It’ll be finished before 2087, I hope. Brandon Sanderson will probably have to finish it.
MG: And the future? You have The Thorn of Emberlain coming. Was it always a seven-book series?
SL: I might make it 49 books, Marcus. That okay? No, I’m a believer in sticking to what you say in terms of the number of books. I hit on seven as a number between three and infinity. I don’t want a series splitting and becoming unmanageable. I’m big on structure. I’m a structuralist. The number of books is significant.
With The Republic of Thieves, I gave Simon Spanton at Gollancz half the book and said, ‘Let’s end on a cliff-hanger. I’ll do part two another time.’ Simon, to his infinite credit said, ‘Let’s park that and wait till you get better. And I now see he was right.’ The Wheel of Time was meant to be a trilogy! I don’t want to do ‘Hitchhiker’s book five in the trilogy’. I want to land the thing properly in seven books.
Question from A J Dalton in the audience: Who was your favourite Doctor Who? And would you ever write a Doctor Who novel?
SL: Oh, whatever answer I give is going to be like blasphemy to some. My favourite Doctor was… Sylvester (and my second was Tom Baker). Look, I was a lonely kid. I saw the novel ‘Remembrance of the Daleks’ on another kid’s desk and the cover and style of it was fascinating, like an artefact from an alien world. It opened other worlds to me. It was a Sylvester book.
I wrote Doctor Who fanfic as both a kid and an adult. I would murder my own grandmother to write a Doctor Who novel. But I should finish my own book first, should I, Marcus?
MG: I’ll do you a deal. Hand in your own book first and I’ll introduce you to the head of BBC Books.
Just been interviewed on the Library of Erana website. Seemed like the thing to do, didn’t it. https://libraryoferana.wordpress.com/2016/09/21/author-interview-116-a-j-dalton-fantasy/.
Would you want to be an angel? The pay’s terrible and you get nothing but complaints from dissatisfied mortals. The Book of Angels is now out there in e-book and hardback. It contains warnings, secrets and delights. It’s divine, divisive and downright dastardly. And it might just save you, desperate a case though you are.