The new Frankenstein – Bloodshot #moviereview #Bloodshot #VinDiesel @EizaGonzalez

Based on the Valiant comic book, the sci-fi movie Bloodshot is an updated Universal Soldier, which of course is an updated Frankenstein story, which is of course an updated Pinocchio story, which of course is an updated Satan-rebelling-against-God-as-maker story. But Frankenstein is the Ur science fiction story that seems most conspicuous here. Vin Diesel plays the animated corpse – and he’s quite convincing as a corpse. All the actors around him have to work particularly hard to keep him animated, as it happens. The fact that he’s incapable of any inflection or intonation in his voice does make you wonder if he’s even capable of any emotion (or thought) behind those tiny eyes of his. The mad scientist of the piece is played by Guy Pearce, who really doesn’t have much to work with.

Now, you may say that I should have expected the film to be pretty pants, given that it’s a Vin Diesel vehicle. But I’d have to come back with Pitch Black and the Chronicles of Riddick – both decent sci-fis with the big guy in the lead role. Bloodshot‘s all a bit of a shame, really, because some of the early plot twists are quite decent, and the action sequences are visually impressive (although without any genuine jeopardy). Were it not for VD, it could all have been that bit better.

Plot? There is one of a sort. A dead soldier is resurrected by a scientist and used as a self-repairing (nanobots/nanites) killing machine. The machine is driven by a desire for revenge based on false memories. But the machine then becomes properly self-aware and wants to break free of its murderous programming! There’s one decent scene between monster and maker, where the maker nearly convinces the monster that having clear orders, purpose and direction in ‘life’ is far better than being entirely free. VD grunts and groans his way through it all, failing to grasp the more complex philosophical implications of it all, and then kills everyone and everything. The end.

Is there any point watching it at all? Should you save yourself 1hr40mins? Well, fans of Eiza Gonzalez will find the movie pleasant viewing, so there is that. Otherwise, it scores 5 out of 10 from me.

Get down with ‘Upload’ on Prime #Upload @UploadOnPrime #TheGoodPlace #Downsizing #sciencefiction

Fans of The Good Place and the Matt Damon movie Downsizing will love Upload. It’s got some lovely near-future ideas in it, intelligently balancing the potential positives with the satirically dystopian, and serves up ten tightly-plotted half-hour episodes. I know people who watched all ten episodes back-to-back!

An app developer called Nathan (played by Robbie Amell) is in a driverless car accident and dying. Fortunately, his rich girlfriend is on hand to offer him a digital afterlife – if he’ll just sign here so his consciousness can be uploaded. Against his better judgement, he wakes up to find himself in the hotel of Lake View – a sort of eternal hotel full of awful people. He realises that the afterlife is effectively a prison. But how can he escape the machine? Is there a way to be downloaded back into a living body? And why does he have particular gaps in his memory.

He finds there are precious few ‘people’ he can trust. He has a ‘handler’ who seems nice, although she’s employed by the owners of the Lake View app/digital platform. He’s monitored at all times. And everything seems ‘loaded’ against him.

Sounds dark, right? Actually, it’s very funny and bitter sweet. They’ve got the tone and sense of wonder spot on. Amazon Prime, you’re really leaving Netflix for dead at the mo. During lockdown, the big stuff I’ve been watching has been the Bosch new series, all the series of Elementary and now Upload. I’ve not switched on Netflix in ages. Upload is a 9.9/10 for me.

Creative writing mini-lesson: no.17 ‘writing science fiction, part 2’… THE COVID19 SPECIAL EDITION! #Lockdown #coronavirus #creativewriting #FridayMotivation #FridayThoughts #FridayMorning #sciencefiction

Decide if each of the statements below is true (T) or false (F).

1. Good sci-fi is ‘grounded’.
2. A sci-fi novel must include future technology (AI, robots, spaceships, etc) or alien life.
3. With sci-fi book sales at an all-time low, the genre is probably less relevant nowadays.
4. With its laser guns and robots, sci-fi is all a bit silly.
5. As Brian Aldiss said, we don’t really need to read about sci-fi anymore because we live in a world where new technology comes out every week and we don’t really understand how any of it works.
6. With its sense of the alien ‘other’, sci-fi is just as important as any other genre.
7. Dystopian fiction (e.g. The Hunger Games) satirises today’s society.
8. Sci-fi doesn’t need strong characterisation or a particularly logical plot.
9. ‘Realist sci-fi’ like The Martian (the Matt Damon movie) isn’t as progressive as other types of sci-fi.

 

 

Answers: 1T, 2T, 3F, 4F, 5T, 6T, 7T, 8F, 9F

The statements and answers above give us some particular insights about sci-fi. Firstly, although it’s less popular in terms of its literature than it once was, it’s as popular as ever in terms of TV and film. Therefore, if you’re going to write sci-fi, you probably want to be quite filmic in your style and composition.

Sci-fi is not just silly and made up. It captures the very real experience of today’s world (as Mr Aldiss pointed out), including its totalitarian regimes (The Hunger Games/Putin’s Russia), alien invasion (District 9/waves of immigrants) and its genetic plague scenarios (World War Z/Covid-19). It satirises society, it explores situations, it provides warnings (if we would but listen), and it implicitly suggests possible solutions.

Central to sci-fi, however, is the issue of technology. Fundamentally, all sci-fi is about using a new technology (or technological function) to change our lives or the wider world. That ‘vision’ of the future is invaluable to us. Why? How so? Isn’t it just made-up silliness? No, it’s not.

Think about Star Trek, the original series. Are phasers, communicators and nano-technology completely silly and made-up nowadays? Why do you think China banned all sci-fi for 100 years, but now hosts a global sci-fi conference every year? Think.

[If you would like to learn more about all of the above, I would recommend my new title: The Satanic in Science Fiction and Fantasy. Hey! It’s up to you.]

Quick task

• Imagine you have arrived on a planet where the aliens (the majority) do not welcome humans (the minority). They think humans bring germs. All humans are put into a holding camp. Write the beginning of a story from the perspective of a human in one of the camps…
• Remember ‘the rule of 5’ for description of the setting… and ‘the rule of 5’ for describing a character… and the 6-step plot that requires a moral dilemma at the start (previous lessons)…
• Discuss or plan things for 5mins…
• And then write the opening paragraph or two… GO!

If you’d like me to look at your attempt, please do feel free to email me (Adam): adz_d2003 @ yahoo.co.uk – deleting the two spaces either side of the @ sign.

I’ll be posting a new lesson every day (Monday-Friday), to help people who are stuck at home because of the coronavirus situation. These mini-lessons will give you a useful daily routine, and might just keep you sane! Stay safe.

If you enjoyed this mini-lesson, do SHARE it with others.

Creative writing mini-lesson: no.16 ‘writing science fiction, part 1’ #Lockdown #coronavirus #creativewriting #ThursdayMotivation #ThursdayThoughts #ThursdayMorning #sciencefiction

Look at the following science fiction movies and TV series, and try and identify from which original book (‘Ur-narrative’) they all borrow their basic plot-line or scenario!

1. WestWorld
2. Battlestar Galactica
3. The Blade Runner
4. Avengers: Age of Ultron
5. Metropolis
6. Ex Machina

 

 

Answer: Frankenstein: Or the Modern Prometheus, by Mary Shelley, 1816!

Amazing, right? But why do science fiction writers almost have to come back to this fundamental plot again and again? Well, Frankenstein represented not only a massive shift in how the plot-lines of literature were driven and organised; it also described the massive shift in society and thinking that was enabled by technology.

How so? Well, prior to Frankenstein, most western literature operated with God’s will as the organising function of the plot’s progression, and ‘natural justice’ (or God’s judgement upon the relative ‘goodness’ or ‘badness’ of the protagonist and antagonist) served as the plot’s resolution (and lesson). In Frankenstein, however, the character of the human scientist replaces God as the organising function of the plot, by using technology to bring (im)mortality, existence and Creation itself entirely within his own control! Famously, even when the scientist abandons his monstrous creation, the end of the narrative is left ambiguous, both in terms of its moral judgement and resolution.

And the social context that both informed and was reflected in the novel Frankenstein? The UK was experiencing the Industrial Revolution, when technology was changing our day-to-day lives, the nature of work, our relationship to the natural world/God’s Creation (we could now use the Earth on a massive scale to suit our own ends, rather than simply being at its mercy), and the very organisation of society itself (the working classes began to realise new social freedoms and a middle class began to emerge).

Frankenstein is the original narrative that encapsulates humankind’s desire to transcend our own corporeal limitations (of our physical bodies and/or our place on Earth), to become something more or to discover something more. In some ways, then, it is the only science fiction story that has ever been told. [If you would like to learn more about the above, I would recommend my new title: The Satanic in Science Fiction and Fantasy. Hey! It’s up to you.]

Quick task

Write a short plot outline (or write a short piece of flash fiction) that represents a modern version of the Frankenstein story. You might like to start with one of these scenarios…

• An army doctor despairs of the war. He looks at all the dead bodies around him in the medical tent. He mourns for the loss… Most of the bodies are so mutilated that the deceased will never even be identified…
• A woman has been so unlucky and abused by love, that she decides she will have to build herself the ‘perfect’ man, one who will obey her desires. Now to collect the parts!
• A lonely child decides to create a friend for themselves out of snow…
• An old person does not want to die. They have read Sergio Canavero’s medical paper that ‘head transplants’ should be possible, but the Italian government has banned the practice (true story, by the way!). The old person is becoming more desperate and ill with every day that passes. They need a young body as soon as possible…

If you’d like me to look at your attempt, please do feel free to email me (Adam): adz_d2003 @ yahoo.co.uk – deleting the two spaces either side of the @ sign.

I’ll be posting a new lesson every day (Monday-Friday), to help people who are stuck at home because of the coronavirus situation. These mini-lessons will give you a useful daily routine, and might just keep you sane! Stay safe.

If you enjoyed this mini-lesson, do SHARE it with others.

A J Dalton is interviewed and all his ugly truths are exposed, including his more than passing familiarity with Satan! Fie, for shame! #Satan #TheDarkLord #authors #authorconfessions #horror #sciencefiction #fantasy #MondayMood

Argh! Don’t look at it. Put out your eyes! Don’t tell anyone. Bite out your tongue! https://www.lunapresspublishing.com/post/interview-with-aj-dalton-by-megan-bond

The Dark Lord’s journey – a short video #fantasy #sciencefiction #creativewriting

From The Satanic in Science Fiction and Fantasy!

The history of fantasy – a short video #fantasy #sciencefiction #creativewriting

It all started with the Bible!